Peace in Guatemala: settling for what seems possible or aiming for what is desirable

This work has to analyse the peace process in Guatemala within a peacebuilding framework. That’s why that despite of a recall of the negotiations course, the implementation of the Peace Accords is emphasized.

Given the magnitude of the subject, efforts were focused on two types of workers on one hand : women and native people, and on a field on the other hand : decentralization and civil society empowerment policy through Urban and Rural Developement Councils.

The theoretical considerations lie at the debate between minimalist and maximalist prospects experiments of peace process. The analysis of this subject is about knowing if the magnitude of Peace Accords contents and the quantity of objectives to reach is questioning or not the possibility of their implementation.

To give an answer to this question, the study takes into account the major flows in the performance of peace accords, including the inability to implement all commitments to generate economical and financial necessary basis for the State to achieve the objectives of peace.

The successes are also reviewed, as the achieved objectives, as well as change processes implemented. TLes réussites obtenues sont également passées en revue, tout comme les objectifs atteints ainsi que les processus de changement mis en œuvre.

The argument is that the very nature of agreements required more time for their implementation.

The results of field work are transcribed, and with documentary analysis have build the axes of methodology ; Sont retranscrits les résultats du travail de terrain, lesquels avec les analyses documentaires, ont constitué les axes de la méthodologie ; research has been carried out by actors of indigenous peoples and women’s movements, as well as through the monitoring of some Developpement Concil’s experiments. The study also discusses the dynamics of peace in local and regional level, identifying what were its successes and difficulties.

The macro levelled analysis and micro levelled field studies can propose a series of lessons learned and to say that the potential transformation of the Agreements is real so that these agreements should continue to be part of the agenda the nation in the coming years.

Authors of the dossier :

• This dossier was made by Gabriel Aguilera Peralta.

• With the participation of :

  • Carmen Lucía Pellecer

  • Braulia Thillet de Solórzano

  • Aura Azucena Bolaños

  • Otilia Lux de Cotí

Notes :

• (*) : The WKOP project is funded by :

  • Canadian International Development Agency. (CIDA)

  • International Development Research Centre (IDRC) Canadá

  • Ford Foundation

  • Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD)

• Autor de la ficha : Stephen Baranyi, Instituto Norte-Sur, Ottawa, Canadá.

• Programa de Participación y Democracia. Guatemala.

In partnership with :

•  

  • North South Institut, Canadá.

  • Centre for the Study of Democracy and Development, Mozambique

  • Center for Policy and Development Studies, Afganistan

  • Universidad de Notre-Dame, Haiti

  • Policy Survey Research Centre, Palestina

  • Social Scientists Association, Sri Lanka

  • Chr. Michelsen Institute.

  • International Peace Research Institute (PRIO) Noruega

For more information, see : www.nsi-ins.ca

Fiches du dossier